The Race to Replace the Petrodollar
If the West wins, your dollar survives, but borrowing costs you more. If China wins, Beijing writes the rules of your financial life. The race started without you.
On May 27, 2026, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) announced that Project Agorá, its prototype for programmable cross-border settlement between the world’s major central banks, had passed its simulation phase and was preparing to move to real-value transactions. The announcement received no mainstream coverage. It should have. Agorá is the Western half of a race already underway: a contest between two programmable monetary architectures, one built by the West and one built by China, both designed to embed government compliance rules directly into money before it moves. Neither system was debated publicly. Neither was put to a vote. And the Iran conflict, now in its third month, has just demonstrated in real time what happens when the alternative rails are ready, and a war begins.
THREE THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW
If the world stops needing dollars, your mortgage rate goes up, your grocery bill goes up, and the US government has to cut services or raise your taxes to cover the difference.
The dollar is strong because the world needs it. Countries buy oil in dollars. They settle trade in dollars. They hold dollars in reserve. That global demand is what keeps your mortgage rate lower than it would otherwise be, your imported goods cheaper, and the US government able to borrow without paying higher interest rates. That is now changing. Two new financial systems are being built, one by the West and one by China, both designed to move money without using dollars. The country that wins that race decides whose rules the global economy runs on for the next hundred years.
The rules being written today between banks and governments will determine how you can send money, receive your salary, and access your own accounts in the future.
What is being built today moves money between banks and governments across borders. That is the institutional layer. But it never stays there. The programmable rules being tested between central banks today will govern how you send money, receive your salary, and access your own accounts tomorrow. China already ran this experiment. The wholesale layer came first. The retail layer followed. The United States is next.
When Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz, they collected the toll in yuan. The US could not stop it.
In 2022, the US cut Russia off from the global banking system. It was the most powerful financial weapon America had ever used. It worked. It also showed every rival exactly what American financial power looks like and exactly how to build around it. When the war with Iran started in 2026, and Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz, they charged tolls on 20 percent of the world’s oil supply in yuan, through channels the US cannot touch. The weapon met its first real test. It did not stop the transaction.
Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates and one of the world’s most closely watched macro investors, has been direct about the consequence: when foreign governments stop buying US Treasuries, yields rise, mortgage rates spike, and the cost of financing American life, public and private, goes up. That process is not theoretical. It is already in motion.
Why This is Happening Now
To understand what is being built, you need to understand what already exists.
SWIFT is a member-owned cooperative that operates a secure financial messaging network used by banks globally. It functions as the backbone of international finance, providing the standardized language and platform through which more than 11,000 financial institutions communicate.
When a payment crosses a border, SWIFT carries the message. It does not move money. It moves instructions. Banks on both ends hold the actual funds, and SWIFT tells them what to do with them. The process takes days. It is expensive. It runs through chains of correspondent banks, each adding delay and cost.
More importantly, it is controlled by Western institutions and subject to Western law.
On February 24, 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine. The response from the West was not only military. It was financial. Western nations agreed to block selected Russian banks from SWIFT as part of a new round of financial sanctions meant to impose a severe cost on Russia for the invasion. The goal was explicit. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stated that cutting banks off would stop them from conducting most of their financial transactions worldwide and effectively block Russian exports and imports. The parallel aim was to freeze Russia's central bank's assets and freeze its transactions.
Russia held $630 billion in foreign exchange reserves. The SWIFT sanction froze their access to those reserves. The ruble devalued by more than 50 percent.
Two lessons were learned from that moment. And they were learned by opposite sides.
The West learned that control of financial messaging infrastructure is one of its most powerful geopolitical tools. The rest of the world learned that any country dependent on that infrastructure is permanently vulnerable to it.
Both lessons produced the same response: build something new.
The Technology Behind It
Most people who have heard of blockchain think of Bitcoin or Ethereum. Public networks. Open to anyone. No central authority. Transactions visible to all.
What Agorá and mBridge are building is the opposite of that.
Both run on distributed ledger technology, which is the institutional term for blockchain. But neither uses a public network. Both use permissioned ledgers: private, controlled systems where only authorized participants can transact and validate.
The mBridge Ledger is purpose-built for central bank use, incorporating privacy features, compliance controls, and high-throughput transaction processing. Its Proof of Authority architecture means that the transaction validation authority is held by the participating central banks.
In Bitcoin, anyone can validate a transaction. In mBridge, only the People’s Bank of China, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, the Bank of Thailand, the UAE central bank, and the Saudi central bank can validate. The ledger is distributed in name. The power is centralized in practice.
Agorá follows the same model. Central banks control the rails. Private banks transact on them. Everyone else is not in the room.
Many retail investors have been told that Ripple’s XRP token will become the bridge currency for cross-border payments, sitting in the middle of every international transaction and eventually connecting central bank digital currencies across borders. The thesis is specifically cross-border: XRP as a neutral intermediary that replaces the correspondent banking chain. No central bank has confirmed actual settlement using XRP. Most testing happens on private or permissioned networks, not the public XRP Ledger. And the fundamental problem remains: China, Russia, and the United States are each building systems they control entirely. None of them will hand the bridge currency role to a private American company’s token. That would simply recreate the dependency they are each trying to eliminate.
The entire point of mBridge is to route around exactly that kind of dependency. Central banks building programmable money systems are not going to hand the bridge currency role to a private American company’s token. That would simply recreate the vulnerability they are trying to eliminate.
The word blockchain is the same. The architecture is the opposite. The power structure is the opposite.
What is being built here is not decentralized finance. It is centralized finance on a new substrate. Faster. More programmable. More controlled.
The Western Architecture
Project Agorá involves the Bank of England, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the Bank of France representing the Eurosystem, the Bank of Japan, the Bank of Korea, the Bank of Mexico, and the Swiss National Bank, alongside more than 40 private-sector financial institutions.
The private sector participants are not minor players. They include JPMorgan Chase, Citi, HSBC, Deutsche Bank, BNP Paribas, UBS, Mastercard, Visa, Swift, Euroclear, Standard Chartered, Lloyds, NatWest, Santander, BBVA, Mizuho, MUFG, and Sumitomo Mitsui, among others.
Every major Western financial institution. In one project. Building the same thing.
The official language describes what they built carefully.
The prototype enables atomic, multi-currency settlement of wholesale cross-border payments. By leveraging smart contracts, the platform allows financial institutions to embed workflow logic, compliance requirements, and conditional payment triggers directly into transactions.
Atomic settlement means the transaction either completes entirely or fails entirely. No float. No partial state. No ability to reverse after the fact.
And embedded directly into each transaction: compliance requirements. Conditional payment triggers.
This is not a faster wire transfer. This is money that can be programmed to refuse. Money that knows whether the conditions attached to it have been satisfied before it moves.
The financial system has never had this capability before. Now it does.
How It Works
Picture a clothing manufacturer in Mexico buying fabric from a supplier in South Korea.
The Mexican company instructs its bank to send the payment. The bank does not have a direct relationship with any South Korean bank. So the payment travels through a chain of intermediary banks, each passing the instruction along, each running its own checks, each adding time and cost. The process takes three to five days. Fees accumulate at every step. The Mexican manufacturer does not know exactly when the money will arrive. The South Korean supplier does not release the fabric until it does.
This happens millions of times a day across the global economy. It is slow. It is expensive. It fails unpredictably. And every bank in the chain is checking the same sanctions lists and running the same anti-money-laundering screens, sometimes reaching different conclusions.
Now picture the same transaction on Agorá.
The payment initiates. The compliance checks run once, simultaneously, embedded in the transaction itself. The money either moves or it does not. Settlement is complete in seconds. No chain of intermediaries. No duplicate checks. No uncertainty about timing.
That is the efficiency case. It is real.
It is also not the whole story.
The system runs on two layers. Tokenized commercial bank deposits sit on one layer. Tokenized central bank reserves sit on the other. Each central bank operates its own ledger. This structure allows countries to keep full control over their own currencies while plugging into a shared infrastructure for cross-border settlement.
Sovereignty preserved on the surface. Interoperability underneath.
One of the key impediments to smooth cross-border payments is compliance. With Project Agorá, the aim is to perform screening at the start of the payment process and to share it across banks, helping to reduce one of the major delays: every bank doing the same checks independently, sometimes with different results. A key benefit of tokenization is that there is no separation of the message and the money movement. The money either moves or it does not.
Faster. Cheaper. More reliable.
And: no human review. No appeal. No one to call.
The Bank of Canada has now joined the project, and additional financial institutions are expected to follow. The next phase will involve real-value testing with actual money moving across the system.
It moves from simulation to real money in the months ahead.
China’s Cross-Border Layer: mBridge
While Agorá was running simulations, a parallel network was processing real money across real borders.
It is called mBridge. It connects the central banks of China, Hong Kong, Thailand, the United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia. It settles in 15 seconds without SWIFT, without correspondent banks, and without a single public cryptocurrency involved.
mBridge has now settled over 4,000 cross-border transactions worth roughly $55 billion. China’s digital yuan accounts for an estimated 95% of total settlement volume.
That last number is the tell. mBridge is operationally a Chinese payment rail. Every transaction runs on Beijing’s infrastructure. Every transaction embeds Beijing’s compliance rules.
The BIS understood what this meant. It stepped back from mBridge in 2024, seeking to distance itself from speculation that the platform could be used to bypass international sanctions. Since then, the BIS has shifted its focus to Project Agorá, which involves several major Western central banks.
The BIS chose a side. Agorá is the Western response to mBridge.
The Petrodollar Connection
Here is why Saudi Arabia’s presence on mBridge matters beyond the transaction volumes.
Since the 1970s, oil has been priced and settled in US dollars. That single arrangement is the foundation of dollar dominance. Countries need dollars to buy oil. That creates permanent global demand for the dollar. That demand funds the American deficit and underwrites American financial power.
Saudi Arabia on mBridge means oil has an alternative settlement rail.
The platform reduces international payment costs by an estimated 40 to 60 percent and cuts settlement times from days to seconds, all without routing through the dollar-based correspondent banking system.
A growing share of Saudi oil sold to China is being settled in yuan. India is settling Russian crude purchases in Chinese yuan and UAE dirhams, bypassing the US dollar entirely.
In 2024, Saudi Arabia did not formally renew its commitment to pricing oil exclusively in dollars. The dollar’s share of global foreign exchange reserves has fallen from 71 percent in 1999 to roughly 57 percent today.
Saudi Arabia is not abandoning the dollar. Not yet. It remains deeply integrated into dollar-denominated financial markets, holds substantial US Treasury positions, and has significant institutional and economic reasons to maintain that relationship. However, each yuan-denominated oil transaction, however small, reduces the marginal cost of the next one.
The dollar still sets the price of oil. What is changing, quietly and without announcement, is how the payment underneath that price actually moves. China is not attacking the dollar’s role in pricing. It is building an alternative to the dollar’s role as a settlement currency. If you control how oil is settled, you eventually influence how it is priced.
The infrastructure for exit is being built before it is needed. That is precisely how these transitions work. They do not announce themselves. They construct alternatives quietly, until the moment the alternative is cheaper, faster, and more reliable than the system it replaces.
That moment is not here. The rail is.
Then Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz.
On February 28, 2026, Israel and the United States began strikes against Iran, targeting its nuclear and ballistic missile program. Iran’s Supreme Leader was killed. Iran launched counter-strikes and closed the Strait. The Strait of Hormuz carries roughly a fifth of the world’s oil and gas trade.
Iran did not ask for dollars to reopen it.
Since mid-March 2026, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has charged ship operators up to $2 million per vessel to transit the strait, accepting payment in Chinese yuan routed through Kunlun Bank via CIPS, outside SWIFT, or in Bitcoin.
On May 27, 2026, the US Treasury designated Iran’s so-called Persian Gulf Strait Authority, an IRGC-linked scheme to extort international shipping seeking to transit the Strait of Hormuz.
That designation is three days old.
The US deployed its most powerful financial weapon against Russia in 2022. SWIFT exclusion. It worked. The lesson was learned. Iran and China spent the intervening years building alternative rail lines. mBridge. CIPS. Yuan settlement corridors. Now there is a war. Iran charges tolls on 20 percent of the world’s oil supply. It collects in yuan through the Chinese banking infrastructure; the US cannot sanction without sanctioning China itself.
Every successful yuan-denominated transaction that bypasses the dollar system is simultaneously a technical proof of concept for sanctions evasion and an institutional precedent that normalizes non-dollar settlement in global trade.
The alternative rails are no longer being tested in simulations. They are moving money through the most strategically important waterway on earth. In an active conflict. In a currency that the United States cannot block.
That is not the rail being built. That is the rail being used.
The Expansion
mBridge is not staying where it is.
With India chairing BRICS in 2026, there is a proposal to link the CBDCs of BRICS members for cross-border trade and tourism payments.
If that connects, mBridge expands from a China-Gulf corridor into a BRICS payment network. That is China, Russia, India, Brazil, South Africa, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and others. Roughly half the world’s population. Roughly a third of global GDP.
A parallel global monetary infrastructure. Not theoretical. In construction.
On the other hand, the Agorá prototype combines tokenized commercial bank deposits and wholesale central bank money on a programmable platform to improve the speed, efficiency, transparency, and accessibility of international payments. Canada just joined. More institutions are expected to follow.
Two systems. Expanding toward each other.
What This Means For Your Money
The outcome of this contest is not abstract. It lands differently depending on who wins.
If Agorá wins
The dollar remains the dominant reserve currency. The US keeps its ability to enforce sanctions. The petrodollar system survives in a modernized form. Western compliance rules stay embedded in global trade.
But your borrowing costs still rise. Agorá is not a dollar system. It is a multi-currency system designed to settle trade in local currencies, gradually reducing the volume of transactions that require the dollar as an intermediary. Even a Western win softens the structural demand that has kept your mortgage rate artificially low for decades. The dollar remains dominant. It becomes less indispensable. That difference is felt slowly, then all at once.
If mBridge wins
This is the scenario that lands directly on your kitchen table.
Foreign governments no longer need dollars to settle trade. Demand for US Treasuries falls. The US government has to pay more to borrow. Higher Treasury yields mean higher mortgage, car loan, and credit card rates. The dollar weakens. Imports become more expensive. Inflation becomes harder to control. The Fed has less room to maneuver.
And there is a deeper consequence. If mBridge wins, Beijing’s compliance rules become the architecture of global trade. Not Washington’s. Not Brussels’. Beijing’s. Every transaction that crosses a border runs on Chinese infrastructure and embeds Chinese political conditions. Countries that want access to that system play by Beijing’s rules. That is not just an economic outcome. It is a civilizational one.
If neither wins outright
This is the most likely scenario. Two systems running in parallel, each dominating its own bloc. That fragmentation is itself a loss for the dollar. A monopoly on financial infrastructure is becoming a duopoly. Duopolies are less powerful than monopolies. American leverage declines even without a decisive Chinese victory. Your borrowing costs rise either way. The question is by how much and over how long.
The decisions being made right now, in institutions most Americans have never heard of, determine which of these outcomes arrives first.
Two Systems, One Condition
Here is what neither official narrative will tell you.
Agorá and mBridge are not opposites. They do not represent freedom versus control. They represent two versions of the same thing: money that executes rules automatically, before a transaction is permitted, without human review and without appeal.
The difference is in whose rules get encoded.
Agorá encodes Western compliance frameworks. OFAC sanctions lists. Bank Secrecy Act requirements. The regulatory logic of Washington and Brussels.
mBridge encodes Beijing’s compliance frameworks. The digital yuan’s behavioral architecture. The rules of the People’s Bank of China.
The dollar’s dominance was never purely military or political. It was infrastructural. SWIFT carried dollars. The petrodollar system required dollars for oil. Both arrangements made the dollar indispensable by embedding it into the plumbing of global trade.
That is exactly what is being contested now. Not with armies. With rails.
You are not choosing between programmable money and free money. That choice was made without you. You are living inside a transition between two monetary systems, both of which treat economic participation as a condition to be granted or withdrawn, and both of which are competing to become the infrastructure that the next century runs on.
That is not a technical distinction. That is the architecture of Coercive Capitalism made geopolitical.
What You Can Do
Most of what is described in this article happens in rooms ordinary people are not invited into. But there are concrete moments coming when the architecture becomes visible, when public input is still possible, and when paying attention is itself a form of preparation.
Watch the BRICS Summit. September 12 and 13, 2026. New Delhi.
The 18th BRICS Summit has BRICS Pay full operational deployment targeted for the summit, alongside a formal proposal from the Reserve Bank of India to link the CBDCs of member nations, including the e-Rupee, China’s digital yuan, Brazil’s DREX, and the UAE dirham. If that proposal is adopted, mBridge ceases to be a China-Gulf corridor and becomes the payment backbone of a bloc representing roughly half the world’s population. That is not a financial story. It is a geopolitical one. And it will be covered as a diplomatic event rather than a monetary one. Read past the headlines.
Watch Agorá move to real-value transactions.
The BIS has not announced a date. But the prototype passed. The next announcement will not say “we are building programmable money.” It will say “we are improving cross-border payment efficiency.” Those are the same sentence. When you see it, you will know what it means.
Watch the GENIUS Act implementation.
Federal agencies have until July 18, 2026, to complete most required rulemakings under the GENIUS Act, with full implementation taking effect January 18, 2027. The rules being written right now determine how stablecoins are issued, who supervises them, and what compliance architecture gets embedded into American consumer payments. The Treasury’s comment period on the principles governing state-level stablecoin regimes closed June 2, 2026. Most people did not know it was open. The next opportunity to comment will come when the OCC finalizes its implementation rules. Watch for it.
The one thing you can do right now.
Understand the system before it is finished. The window to see this clearly, to name what is being built and why it matters, is open now. It will not stay open. Infrastructure does not invite debate once it is in place. Share this article with one person who needs to read it. That is not a small thing. The institutions building these systems are counting on the public not paying attention.
This article is part of the research behind Coercive Capitalism, a forthcoming book on the economic infrastructure being built to control who participates in modern life. If you want to be notified when the book is ready, subscribe below
Sources
Institutional and Government
Bank for International Settlements. Project Agorá: Unified Ledger for Cross-Border Payments. May 27, 2026. bis.org.
Bank for International Settlements. mBridge: Exploring Multi-CBDC Arrangements for Cross-Border Payments. 2024. bis.org.
U.S. Department of the Treasury. Economic Fury Targets Illicit Oil Revenue Fueling Iran’s Military. May 27, 2026. treasury.gov.
U.S. Department of State. United States Sanctions Iranian Financial and Shipping Networks. May 2026. state.gov.
European Commission. Statement by President von der Leyen on Further Measures to React to Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine. February 26, 2022. ec.europa.eu.
Paradigm. GENIUS Act Rulemaking Tracker. 2026. paradigm.xyz.
Legislation and Regulation
FinCEN and OFAC. Proposed Rule: GENIUS Act Anti-Money Laundering and Sanctions Compliance Requirements. April 2026. treasury.gov.
American Bankers Association. ABA and State Association Letter Requesting Extension of GENIUS Act Comment Deadline. May 6, 2026. aba.com.
FDIC. FDIC Extends Comment Period on Proposal to Establish GENIUS Act Application Procedures. February 6, 2026. fdic.gov.
Geopolitical and Conflict
Atlantic Council. Inside Tehran’s Toll Booth. April 2, 2026. atlanticcouncil.org.
TRM Labs. Iranian Crypto Tolls in Strait of Hormuz. April 10, 2026. trmlabs.com.
Chainalysis. Iran’s Strait of Hormuz Crypto Toll. April 10, 2026. chainalysis.com.
House of Commons Library. US-Iran Ceasefire and Nuclear Talks in 2026. May 2026. parliament.uk.
Council on Foreign Relations. U.S. Continues Economic and Diplomatic Pressure on Iran. April 21, 2026. cfr.org.
Asia Times. Iran’s Hormuz Yuan Play a Direct Hit on the Petrodollar. March 25, 2026. asiatimes.com.
Foreign Affairs Forum. The Petroyuan Ultimatum: Iran, the Strait of Hormuz, and the Structural Unraveling of Dollar Hegemony. March 16, 2026. faf.ae.
Fortune. Iran Is Already Charging a Toll, in Yuan, for Oil Sold Through Strait of Hormuz. March 26, 2026. fortune.com.
VinciWorks. The Compliance Fallout from the 2026 Iran War. March 1, 2026. vinciworks.com.
Monetary System and Petrodollar
Quant Network. China’s e-CNY Pivot to Tokenized Deposits. March 2026. quant.network.
IMF Notes No. 26/01. Tokenization and the Future of Money. April 2026. imf.org.
Yahoo Finance. Dalio Warns Dollar Faces Long-Term Decline, Will Underperform Gold and Yuan. January 7, 2026. yahoo.com.
City Creek Mortgage. Today’s Mortgage Rates in May 2026. May 2026. citycreekmortgage.com.
Technology and Infrastructure
BIS. mBridge Ledger: Technical Architecture. 2024. bis.org.
Financial Planning Association. How Ripple XRP Is Building a Bridge to the Future of Cross-Border Transactions. September 2025. financialplanningassociation.org.
Nexo. What Is XRP Used For? Cross-Border Payments Explained. February 27, 2026. nexo.com.
Citi Institute. Stablecoins 2030: Web3 to Wall Street. November 14, 2025. citigroup.com.
BRICS and Expansion
Rio Times Online. BRICS 2026 Complete Guide. May 2026. riotimesonline.com.
Modern Diplomacy. RBI’s Digital Currency Proposal for the BRICS 2026 Agenda. April 21, 2026. moderndiplomacy.eu.
CoinDesk. India Pushes Digital Rupee Through Welfare Pilots as BRICS CBDC Plan Takes Shape. April 24, 2026. coindesk.com.
Asia Times. BRICS Laying First Tracks for New Global Payment System. February 6, 2026. asiatimes.com.
The Defense News. BRICS Develops New Cross-Border Payment System Capable of Handling 20,000 Transactions Per Second. February 18, 2026. thedefensenews.com.